DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
TraficModelV40
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
155 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
100 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque174 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4516 mm
1904 mmWidth1716 mm
1940 mmHeight1425 mm
1791 KgWeight1260 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…