DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2003 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
CarismaModelTrafic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
200 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower100 HP
174 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank90 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4782 mm
1710 mmWidth1904 mm
1405 mmHeight1940 mm
1215 KgWeight1791 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2003 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…