DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Renault Scenic vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ScenicModel156
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
206 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
163 HPPower150 HP
270 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4259 mmLength4441 mm
1810 mmWidth1743 mm
1620 mmHeight1458 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Renault Scenic and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…