DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
156ModelScenic
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
305 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4259 mm
1743 mmWidth1810 mm
1458 mmHeight1620 mm
1510 KgWeight—
2595 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…