DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Mazda Premacy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModelPremacy
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
8 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4168 mmLength4295 mm
1719 mmWidth1705 mm
1609 mmHeight1600 mm
1325 KgWeight1250 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Mazda Premacy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…