DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Premacy vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Premacy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
PremacyModelScenic
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
152 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4168 mm
1705 mmWidth1719 mm
1600 mmHeight1609 mm
1250 KgWeight1325 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Premacy and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Premacy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…