DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModel626
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
162 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
80 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4169 mmLength4660 mm
1719 mmWidth1710 mm
1675 mmHeight1515 mm
1365 KgWeight1280 Kg
2564 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…