2000 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.9 (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 dTi (80 Hp) 2000Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Scenic
MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelScenic
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Scenic
12,9 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
178 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower80 HP
145 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Scenic
4660 mmLength4169 mm
1710 mmWidth1719 mm
1515 mmHeight1675 mm
1280 KgWeight1365 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2564 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…