DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Scenic vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
130 HPPower160 HP
300 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4555 mm
1845 mmWidth1840 mm
1645 mmHeight1710 mm
1540 KgWeight1488 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Scenic and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…