DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
CX-5ModelScenic
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
197 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
160 HPPower130 HP
208 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4560 mm
1840 mmWidth1845 mm
1710 mmHeight1645 mm
1488 KgWeight1540 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…