DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLand Rover
ScenicModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
192 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
300 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4259 mmLength4368 mm
1810 mmWidth1809 mm
1620 mmHeight1708 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2685 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…