DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRenault
FreelanderModelScenic
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
160 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4259 mm
1809 mmWidth1810 mm
1708 mmHeight1620 mm
1510 KgWeight—
2557 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…