DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
ScenicModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
173 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
102 HPPower116 HP
200 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4169 mmLength4435 mm
1719 mmWidth1710 mm
1675 mmHeight1405 mm
1365 KgWeight1130 Kg
2564 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…