DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAudi
ScenicModelA3
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
173 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
102 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4169 mmLength4152 mm
1719 mmWidth1735 mm
1675 mmHeight1427 mm
1365 KgWeight1185 Kg
2564 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…