DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 1998 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.25–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ScenicModelClio
2000Model year1998
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

18,9 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
152 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
118 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4168 mmLength3773 mm
1719 mmWidth1640 mm
1609 mmHeight1417 mm
1275 KgWeight975 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 1998 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…