DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ScenicModel156
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
189 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1783 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
116 HPPower120 HP
158 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4169 mmLength4430 mm
1719 mmWidth1745 mm
1675 mmHeight1415 mm
1250 KgWeight1230 Kg
2564 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…