DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
ZSModelScenic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
19 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
4520 mmLength4169 mm
1700 mmWidth1719 mm
1390 mmHeight1675 mm
1125 KgWeight1250 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2564 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…