DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Scenic vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAudi
ScenicModel80
1996Model year1996
Minivan, MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
165 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
137 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4134 mmLength4482 mm
1719 mmWidth1695 mm
1675 mmHeight1408 mm
1255 KgWeight1355 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Scenic and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…