DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi 80 vs 1996 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeRenault
80ModelScenic
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,3 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
160 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4134 mm
1695 mmWidth1719 mm
1408 mmHeight1675 mm
1355 KgWeight1255 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi 80 and 1996 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…