DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V50 vs 2014 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V50ModelScenic
2012Model year2014
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower140 HP
185 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—Tyre size205/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4573 mm
1845 mmWidth1845 mm
1457 mmHeight—
1381 KgWeight1505/1592 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V50 and 2014 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…