DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Samsung QM3 vs 2013 Renault Captur Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Captur

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.

61.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault SamsungMakeRenault
QM3ModelCaptur
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
220 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 DCTGears6 EDC
205/55 R17 91VTyre size205/60 R16; 205/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4125 mmLength4122 mm
1780 mmWidth1778 mm
1565 mmHeight1566 mm
1300 KgWeight1288 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Samsung QM3 and 2013 Renault Captur approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Captur leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…