2013 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 Go 2013 1.5 i 102 HPOverall Score61.25/100
2013 Mazda 2 vs 2013 Renault Samsung QM3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Renault Samsung
QM3
Renault Samsung QM3 1.5 dCi (90 Hp) 2013Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Renault Samsung QM3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Samsung QM3
MazdaMakeRenault Samsung
2ModelQM3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Samsung QM3
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
102 HPPower90 HP
133 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Samsung QM3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Samsung QM3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6 DCT
AutomaticTransmission—
15Tyre size205/55 R17 91V
NoABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 2SpecificationRenault Samsung QM3
3920 mmLength4125 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1475 mmHeight1565 mm
1065 kgWeight1300 Kg
250 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 2 and 2013 Renault Samsung QM3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Samsung QM3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…