DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Samsung QM3 vs 2013 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Samsung QM3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault SamsungMakeMazda
QM3Model2
2013Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
90 HPPower102 HP
220 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank43 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 DCTGears4
—TransmissionAutomatic
205/55 R17 91VTyre size15
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4125 mmLength3920 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1565 mmHeight1475 mm
1300 KgWeight1065 kg
—Luggage capacity250 lt
2605 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Samsung QM3 and 2013 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Samsung QM3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…