DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Safrane vs 2000 Alpina D10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Safrane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlpina
SafraneModelD10
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
250 km/hTop speed254 km/h
2963 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
263 HPPower245 HP
363 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4763 mmLength4775 mm
1790 mmWidth1800 mm
1414 mmHeight1415 mm
1695 KgWeight1625 Kg
2766 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Safrane and 2000 Alpina D10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Safrane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…