DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alpina D10 vs 1996 Renault Safrane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Safrane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeRenault
D10ModelSafrane
2000Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
254 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2963 cc
245 HPPower263 HP
500 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank76 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4763 mm
1800 mmWidth1790 mm
1415 mmHeight1414 mm
1625 KgWeight1695 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2766 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alpina D10 and 1996 Renault Safrane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Safrane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…