DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Megane vs 2009 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
MeganeModelClio
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
230 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
180 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3991 mm
1808 mmWidth1768 mm
1471 mmHeight1484 mm
1320 KgWeight1240 Kg
2641 mmWheelbase2585 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Megane and 2009 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…