DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Clio vs 2009 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelMegane
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
215 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower180 HP
215 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3991 mmLength4295 mm
1768 mmWidth1808 mm
1484 mmHeight1471 mm
1240 KgWeight1320 Kg
2585 mmWheelbase2641 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Clio and 2009 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…