DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jaguar XF vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeRenault
XFModelMegane
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
241 km/hTop speed255 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
240 HPPower273 HP
500 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
245/45 R18Tyre size225/40 R18; 235/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4955 mmLength4299 mm
1987 mmWidth1848 mm
1496 mmHeight1435 mm
1805 KgWeight1379 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jaguar XF and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…