DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Lincoln MKC Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeLincoln
MeganeModelMKC
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h—
255 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
273 HPPower285 HP
360 NmTorque414 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption13,0 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
225/40 R18; 235/35 R19Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4552 mm
1848 mmWidth1864 mm
1435 mmHeight1656 mm
1379 KgWeight1809 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Lincoln MKC approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…