DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeJaguar
MeganeModelXF
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
255 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
273 HPPower240 HP
360 NmTorque500 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
225/40 R18; 235/35 R19Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4955 mm
1848 mmWidth1987 mm
1435 mmHeight1496 mm
1379 KgWeight1805 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…