DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelMustang
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h—
255 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2264 cc
273 HPPower317 HP
360 NmTorque432 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18; 235/35 R19Tyre size255/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4784 mm
1848 mmWidth1916 mm
1435 mmHeight1394 mm
1379 KgWeight1715 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…