DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Megane vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
MeganeModelLancer
2009Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
245 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
250 HPPower280 HP
340 NmTorque383 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4490 mm
—Width1770 mm
1435 mmHeight1450 mm
1387 KgWeight1320 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Megane and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…