DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2009 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
LancerModelMegane
2004Model year2009
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
250 km/hTop speed245 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
383 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4299 mm
1770 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight1435 mm
1320 KgWeight1387 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2009 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…