DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Megane vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
MeganeModelScenic
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption7 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4164 mmLength—
1698 mmWidth—
1420 mmHeight—
1140 KgWeight1365 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Megane and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…