DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ScenicModelMegane
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
7 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4164 mm
—Width1698 mm
—Height1420 mm
1365 KgWeight1140 Kg
—Wheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…