DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Megane vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
MeganeModel626
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
183 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
200 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 88H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4164 mmLength4575 mm
1698 mmWidth1710 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1140 KgWeight1180 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Megane and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…