DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Megane vs 2006 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelC30
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
188 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4209 mmLength4252 mm
1777 mmWidth1782 mm
1458 mmHeight1447 mm
1270 KgWeight1279 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Megane and 2006 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…