DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo C30 vs 2006 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
C30ModelMegane
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
165 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4252 mmLength4209 mm
1782 mmWidth1777 mm
1447 mmHeight1458 mm
1279 KgWeight1270 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo C30 and 2006 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…