DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelS40
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
199 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1783 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
116 HPPower122 HP
158 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4164 mmLength4516 mm
1698 mmWidth1716 mm
1420 mmHeight1422 mm
1120 KgWeight1255 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…