DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 FAW Bora vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeRenault
BoraModelMegane
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
206 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
125 HPPower116 HP
170 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4376 mmLength4164 mm
1735 mmWidth1698 mm
1446 mmHeight1420 mm
1310 KgWeight1120 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 FAW Bora and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…