DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Acura EL vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura EL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeRenault
ELModelMegane
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower107 HP
139 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4082 mm
1705 mmWidth1698 mm
1395 mmHeight1368 mm
1145 KgWeight1125 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Acura EL and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura EL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…