DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG TF
RenaultMakeMG
MeganeModelTF
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG TF
10,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
107 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG TF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/55 R15Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Renault MeganeSpecificationMG TF
4082 mmLength3943 mm
1698 mmWidth1630 mm
1368 mmHeight1261 mm
1125 KgWeight1125 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…