DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Hyundai Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHyundai
MeganeModelMatrix
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
200 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
107 HPPower122 HP
148 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4025 mm
1698 mmWidth1740 mm
1368 mmHeight1635 mm
1125 KgWeight1358 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Hyundai Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…