DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelFusion
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
200 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower90 HP
148 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4082 mmLength4020 mm
1698 mmWidth1708 mm
1368 mmHeight1503 mm
1125 KgWeight1105 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…