2000 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6i 16V (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Renault Megane vs 2012 Peugeot 301 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Peugeot
301
Peugeot 301 1.6 HDI (92 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Peugeot 301
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.
54.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationPeugeot 301
RenaultMakePeugeot
MeganeModel301
2000Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationPeugeot 301
9,8 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower92 HP
148 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationPeugeot 301
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationPeugeot 301
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationPeugeot 301
4164 mmLength4442 mm
1698 mmWidth1748 mm
1420 mmHeight1466 mm
1085 KgWeight1090 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2652 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Megane and 2012 Peugeot 301 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Peugeot 301 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…