DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelMegane
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower107 HP
148 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14; 175/70 R14; 185/55 R15; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4164 mm
1640 mmWidth1698 mm
1417 mmHeight1420 mm
995 KgWeight1085 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…