DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHonda
MeganeModelFIT
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
260 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank32 lt
3,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4299 mmLength3955 mm
1785 mmWidth1695 mm
1423 mmHeight1525 mm
1205 KgWeight1080 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…