DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
KAModelMegane
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
146 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption3,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,2 lt
—Average consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4299 mm
1695 mmWidth1785 mm
1460 mmHeight1423 mm
1032 KgWeight1205 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…