DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelFigo
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
260 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
3,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V; 225/40 R18Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength3995 mm
1785 mmWidth1695 mm
1423 mmHeight1525 mm
1205 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…