DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
MeganeModelMegane
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
190 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank47 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15 91T; 205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89VTyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4359 mm
1785 mmWidth1814 mm
1423 mmHeight1447 mm
1205 KgWeight1205 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2669 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…